Sony and Samsung, both of the two brands make a ton of customer items outside of TV. Nonetheless, they are overall known for making phenomenal TVs and already getting all the attention to deserving like Sony X950H vs Samsung Q80T vs Samsung Q90T.
Most customers will likely be cheerful purchasing from either, there are particular contrasts as far as which premium technologies they’re pushing (OLED vs QLED), how their sets create sound, what format support you’ll discover, their preparing qualities, and considerably more.
Thus, in the event that you’re thinking about one of these two top TV brands, we wouldn’t be astounded whether you’re finding that it’s hard to choose which one is appropriate for you.
Presently, we should look at Sony X950H vs Samsung Q80T vs Samsung Q90T There and help you settle on a choice.
The Sony X950H is the company’s flagship 4k LED TV for 2020, replacing the Sony X950G from 2019. It is a direct replacement for last year’s X950G and lies just below Sony’s Masters Collection, which includes their OLEDs and the 8k Sony Z8H.
- Delivers rich and accurate color details with Triluminos display
- Excellent Contrast
- eARC Support
- Impressive black levels
- Top-quality motion handling
- Excellent out-of-box color images
- Standard Built-in Sound Quality
- Higher Price
The Samsung Q90T QLED TV is the top of the manufacturer’s 4K QLED lineup and is part of the Samsung 2020 TV catalog. This is a replacement for the Samsung Q80/Q80R QLED, not the Samsung Q90/Q90R QLED, due to a change in Samsung’s lineup.
- Sensational color and brightness thanks to quantum dots
- HDMI 2.1 support
- Features that have one foot in the future
- Support for Samsung’s own Bixby digital assistant, Amazon Alexa, or Google Assistant
- Smooth and reliable navigation with a healthy assortment of streaming apps.
- Better viewing angles
- No Dolby Vision support
- Priced at a premium
The Samsung Q80T is the company’s second-highest-end 2020 4K QLED TV. Although it is a direct replacement for the Q80R from 2019, its performance and picture quality are similar to the Q70R from 2019.
- Excellent response time.
- Great contrast ratio.
- Remarkable reflection handling.
- Support for HDMI 2.1
- Tizen smart TV platform
- Good price for what is offered
- The corners of the screen appear darker.
- No One Connect Box
Comparison Sony X950H vs Samsung Q80T vs Samsung Q90T: Technical Specifications
Three of the TVs have excellent build quality as they are made of mostly plastic but feel well-built and sturdy overall.
Before we get into the details of the design, it’s worth noting that there are two iterations of the TV: one for the 55-, 65-, and 75-inch models, and another for the 49-inch and 85-inch models. The main difference is that the latter uses the chassis and legs from last year, while the former uses a new version.
With slim bezels and minimal branding, the Sony X950H has a plain but striking appearance. While the feet seem to be slim, they are entirely metal and have enough protection for the television. They’re set as large as possible, but they can be pushed inwards to make room for smaller tables.
However, if you are wondering about watching market NFL games, then this might take your interest for a bit.
However, if you are wondering about setting up your personal home theater, then this the right article for you.
The stand is completely metal and supports the TV well, allowing for almost no wobble. There are two potential situations for the feet. We set up our own at the wide position, however, you can set them up at the thin position in the event that you have a more modest table. The feet are likewise compatible, so you don’t need to stress over putting them on the wrong side. The other 49″ variation is exceptional; it’s like the one on the Sony X950G.
However, if you are wondering about activating the TLC go, then this is the article that your are looking for.
The rear of the TV is genuinely plain and made of plastic. It has a level brushed surface, and the inputs are confronting sideways, making them simpler to get to when wall mounted. There are two clips included for the container to attach the cables to the feet, which fill in as a link to the board. The 49″ and 85″ variation has some descending confronting HDMI ports.
The TV is of moderate thickness and doesn’t just a lot when wall mounted. Our unit inclines in reverse a smidgen; notwithstanding, this shifts between units.
The Sony X950H has a great build quality. Despite the fact that it’s generally plastic, it feels all around constructed, and there’s no flex on the backboard, aside from the territory where the data sources are found. The metal stand upholds the TV well, and there’s almost no wobble. The X950H closely resembles a top-notch TV model. Great plan with a pleasant stand, strong development, meager boundaries, and a decent distance gives you the feeling that what you purchase is a top-level TV.
Then again, the Samsung Q80T has a basic and minimalist design with thin bezels on all sides. It’s middle mounted on a platform-style stand. The stand is a blend of metal and plastic. It offers nice help for the TV, yet there’s as yet a considerable lot of wobble. Fortunately, it’s minuscule and doesn’t occupy a lot of room, making it simpler to put a soundbar in front.
The back of the TV is white cardboard, except for a fine horizontal texture carved into it. When the TV is wall-mounted, the inputs are side-facing and readily visible, and grooves direct the cables into the hollow stand, which also acts as cable control. Without the stand, the TV is very slim and shouldn’t protrude too much when wall-mounted.
The construction standard is superb. It’s all made of plastic, but it feels good and well-made. The TV does wobble when pushed, owing to the stand’s configuration.
Likewise, the Samsung Q90T has a beautiful build. It’s plain, fresh, and new. The bezels are dainty on all sides, and the stand is center-mounted, like the Samsung Q80T. The greatest change is the deficiency of the One Connect Box, as this TV is all the more substitutable for the Samsung Q80T QLED.
It has the same kind of stand which is a substantial piece of metal that is strong with a bit of wobble. The bezels on the Samsung Q90T are extremely thin and shouldn’t be distracting. With a brushed look, Samsung Q90T has sort of the same kind of back with an incredible form quality. The TV is thin, thinner than Q80T, and shouldn’t stand out a lot when wall mounted. Unfortunately, it isn’t viable with Samsung’s no-gap wall mount.
Sony X950H has a little less connectivity option than Samsung Q80T and Q90T.
Three of the TVs, the Sony X950H, Samsung Q80T, and Samsung Q90T, have four HDMI ports as their primary connections. HDMI 2.0 Full Bandwidth, HDCP 2.2, and CEC are now supported by both of their HDMI ports. Furthermore, one of their HDMI ports (HDMI 3) supports both ARC and eARC (enhanced Audio Return Channel).
In the meanwhile, one of the HDMI ports on the Q80T and Q90T (HDMI 4) supports HDMI 2.1, while none of the HDMI ports on the X950H do. Despite the fact that the Q80T and Q90T have one HDMI port that supports HDMI 2.1, it only has 40 GB of bandwidth instead of the maximum 48 GHz bandwidth that is normally available.
Consequently, the Q80T and Q90T’s ports do support ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode), while the X950H’s HDMI ports do not.
All of the connections on the Sony X950H are located in the lower right corner, though the design varies depending on the size.
There are two USB ports on each of the TVs. However, there is a disparity in USB 3.0, since one of the USB ports on the X950H is USB 3.0, while the Q80T and Q90t do not have USB 3.0. They still have 1Tuner IN (RF In), 1 Ethernet port, and Q Digital Audio Out in addition to HDMI and USB ports (Optical).
The X950H has Analog Audio Out (3.5 mm Mini Jack), Composite In, and IR ports, while the Q80T and Q90T do not.
The power connector is separated from the others on the left, while two special tweeters are part of Sony’s Acoustic Multi-Audio system at both side corners. The typical VESA wall mount holes are in the center, and that’s pretty much it.
Winner: Samsung Q90T and 80T
Technology and Features
Overall, the Samsung Q90T and Samsung Q80T have better features and innovative technologies than Sony X950H.
Accompanies VA panel technology, three of them have magnificent native contrast ratio that creates them can deliver profound dark. They likewise have a superb shading array and great pinnacle splendor, creating them that can convey a stunning HDR experience.
The fundamental quality of the VA panel is that it has a solid native contrast ratio however then again, it has a helpless side review point. Be that as it may, all things considered, since the two of them utilize an enemy of glare optical layer called “Ultra Viewing Angle” on the Q80Tand Q90T just as “X-Wide Angle” on Sony X950H”, they have a piece distinction in trademark than different TVs with regular VA panel.
The utilization of an anti-glare optical layer may make their local difference proportion isn’t just about as high as traditional VA TV, however, then again, it significantly improves their side review point inclusion.
Luckily, three of them have Full Array Local Dimming technology that can improve their differentiation proportion, so though their difference proportion isn’t just about as high as the traditional VA board, yet their difference proportion is as yet sufficiently able to deliver profound deep dark.
The Sony X950H, Samsung Q90T, and Samsung Q80T likewise use the same backdrop illumination innovation, which is Direct LED backdrop illumination with Full Array Local Dimming. On the Samsung Q80T, its 49 inches variant, 55 inches variant, and 55 inches variant is fueled by Direct Full Array 8x while its 65 inches variant, 75 inches variant, and 85 inches variant are controlled by Direct Full Array 12x. The Samsung Q90T is additionally controlled by Direct Full Array 12x.
The distinction between Direct Full Array 8x and 12x is about the number of dimming zones. Then, actually like the Q80T, there is additionally no data from its authority site about the quantity of darkening zone of the Sony X950H.
The Quantum Processor HDR 4K is used by the Samsung Q80T, while the 4K HDR Processor X1 Ultimate is used by the Sony X950 H. Adaptive Brightness, Adaptive Volume, and Adaptive Sound, as well as AI Up-scaling, are all strengths of the Quantum Processor.
This image processor can generate 4K images with good detail preservation thanks to a combination of AI-based up-scaling and machine learning.
In the meantime, Sony’s X1 Engine series’ flagship is the 4K HDR Processor X1 Ultimate. While it lacks certain AI-based functionality, it does have a feature for optimizing HDR videos.
Image clarity is boosted with Dual Database Processing and Object-Based Super Resolution, contrast is improved with Dynamic Contrast Enhancer and Object-Based HDR Remaster, and the color is enhanced with Precision Color Mapping and Super Bit Mapping HDR.
The Sony X950H and the Samsung Q80T both have native 120 Hz refresh rate panels. This enables them to play any content at a native frame rate of up to 120 frames per second. They can also interpolate lower frame rate material up to 120 HZ for this. Meanwhile, the Q80T and Q90T, with the exception of the Q8049-inch T’s version (QN49Q80T), offer Variable Refresh Rate panels.
Set “Picture Clarity” to “Custom” and “Judder Reduction” and “Blur Reduction” to “0” on the Q80T and Q90T to suppress judder. Meanwhile, on the X950H, set “Cinemotion” to “Auto,” “MotionFlow” to “Custom,” and “Smoothness” and “Clearness” to a minimum.
When the X950H is set to “Cinema,” “Standard,” or “Vivid” modes, it achieves the highest dimming frequency. The X950H, like the Q80T and Q90T, has a Motionflow BFI mode as an option. By enabling this function, the dimming frequency will be set to 120 Hz.
Winner: Samsung Q90T and 80T
Smart TV Platform
Three of them are great smart TV platform which has many smart features and a great selection of apps.
As their smart TV platform, the Samsung Q80T and Q90T run Tizen 2020 while the Sony X950H runs Android TV 9.0 or Android Pie. Their interface is similarly smooth and simple to utilize.
As a matter of fact, there are some streaming applications like Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu, and so on, Live TVs, Games, Web Browser, and so on. Moreover, their applications store both have an extraordinary choice of downloadable applications you can straightforwardly download from your TV.
The two of them likewise have supported some keen home assistants like Amazon Alexa and Google Home. Not exclusively is that the two of them additionally have built-in voice navigation where the Google Android accompanies Google Voice Assistant while the Tizen OS accompanies Samsung’s Bixby.
Also, as their controller, the Samsung Q80T and Samsung Q90T accompanies Samsung’s smart regulator while the Sony X950H accompanies Sony’s Voice Remote. Both of these controllers have a built-in microphone, allowing you to control your TV with your voice command.
The distinction, the far off of the Q80T and Q90T is little and just has not many buttons while the far off of the X950H is genuinely huge and has numerous buttons.
As mid-level TVs, three of them offer excellent picture quality, although Sony X950H and Samsung Q90T have allover better picture quality than Samsung Q80T.
Contrast Ratio and Black Level
The Samsung Q80T, Samsung Q90T, and Sony X950H have great local differentiation proportion. The Samsung Q80T has an incredible local differentiation proportion, with a Native Contrast of 3042: 1, yet it’s lower than an ordinary VA board. This is likely because of the execution of Samsung’s ‘Ultra Viewing Angle’ layer, which improves seeing points to the detriment of contrast ratio.
The Sony X950H has a great native contrast ratio, with native contrast 3170: 1 and it improves when nearby darkening is empowered. Notwithstanding, it’s lower than what we would expect of a VA panel because of Sony’s ‘X-Wide Angle’ layer, which improves viewing angles at the expense of lower contrast. The 49 inches variant of the Q80T and X950H doesn’t have an optical enemy of glare, so expected they have a higher native contrast ratio.
Like most VA panels, the Samsung Q90T has an excellent native contrast ratio with native contrast 4004: 1, and it improves fundamentally with local dimming enabled, permitting it to deliver profound blacks.
Local Dimming Performance
The Sony X950H, Samsung Q90T, and Samsung Q80T have Full Array Local Dimming feature. What’s more, in improving contrast, the local dimming of the Q90T might be superior to both the Samsung Q80T and the X950H, however, in minimizing blooming and improving black uniformity, the nearby darkening of the X950H is superior to the Samsung’s ones.
Generally speaking, the nearby diminishing execution of the Q90T is superior to the X950H. The Q80T’s local dimming isn’t as observable in genuine substance.
SDR Peak Brightness
The Sony X950H has a somewhat more splendid SDR peak brightness than the Q80T. In any case, the Samsung Q90T has the best SDR peak brightness. With genuine substance, the peak brightness of the Samsung Q90T is around 1400 nits, while the X950H can hit around 900 nits the Q80T hits around 700 nits.
SDR peak brightness of the Q80T might be not as splendid as the X950H and the Samsung Q90T, yet it is still brilliant enough to fight the glare in most bright rooms. Furthermore, joining to its great reflection taking care of, this makes the Q80T is a decent TV when utilized in most splendid rooms. Then again, the X950H additionally has magnificent reflection dealing with. Be that as it may, with Samsung Q90T’s more splendid SDR top splendor, it is simpler to battle the glare in a more brilliant room.
HDR Peak Brightness
The Samsung Q90T can get brilliant, enough to deliver a fantastic HDR experience. Nonetheless, actually like in SDR, the brilliance changes relying upon the scene and gets dimmer as bigger zones of the screen are lit.
The Sony X950H additionally has more brilliant HDR top splendor comparable to the Samsung Q90T. In the meantime, very much like their SDR content, their HDR content likewise changes relying upon the content. While it shifts a great deal across various content, the overall brightness is all that anyone could need to convey an awesome HDR experience.
Although not as bright as the X950H, the peak brightness of the Q80T is sufficiently brilliant to convey an awesome HDR experience, particularly in a dark to moderately lit room. Then again, the HDR top brilliance of the X950H is phenomenal.
Color Gamut and Color Volume
The Sony X950H, Samsung Q90T, and Samsung Q80T additionally have an astounding color range. In DCI P3 XY, the Samsung Q90T can accomplish 92%, the Q80T can cover around 89% while the X950H can cover around 91% of shading space. Then, in DCI P3 UV, the Q80T covers around 92%, the X950H covers around 96% and the Q90T is around 93.18 % of color space.
As a rule, the color gamut coverage of both the Q90T and the X950H is somewhat wider than the Q80T. In any case, their distinction isn’t excessively huge and doesn’t fundamentally affect the ordinary content. Likewise, the two of them have a wide shading array, the two of them additionally have great shading volume. They can create profound dull shades and splendid soaked shading genuinely well. As a matter of fact, the colors of HDR images can be shown genuinely precisely and distinctive on their screen.
Furthermore has a better color gamut and volume, the Samsung Q90T and the Sony X950H additionally have color gradient inclination over the Samsung Q80T. On the screen of the Q80T, there is still some fine banding when showing shades of blue, red, and dark. Be that as it may, this ought not to be recognizable in typical content. In like manner, the Q90T can give an astounding inclination execution.
Then again, the color gradient of the X950H is stunningly better. There might be still some fine banding on some specific shadings like green red, blue, and gray, however, they are better than on the screen of the Q90T. What’s more, very much like Q80T or Q90T, they ought not to be perceptible in typical substance.
On the Q80T and Q90T, you can empower “Noise Reduction” in the “Picture Clarity Setting”, while on the X950H, you can enable “Smooth Gradation”. In any case, remember, enabling these features might have the option to eliminate banding, yet then again, this can cause some deficiency of fine details in specific scenes.
In-Game Mode, the input lags of the Samsung Q80T and Q90T are a lot lower than the Sony X950H. With 60 fps content, in any case, the goal, the information slacks of the Q90T is around 10 ms while the input lags of the X950H is around 19 ms. The info slacks of the Q80T are around 14 ms.
Side Viewing Angle
As we have referenced over, three of the TVs utilize an antiglare optical layer that can improve their side review angle inclusion, Ultra Viewing Angle on Samsung Q80T or Q90T and X-Wide Angle on Sony X950H. The utilization of these optical layers may decrease their local difference proportion, however, then again, they altogether improve their side viewing angle.
Overall, the wide viewing angle of the Q90T and Q80T is superior to the X950H. Despite the fact that side viewing angle coverage of the X950H isn’t just like the Q80T or Q90T, however, it is still better compared to ordinary VA TVs. However long it isn’t used in an enormous room with a wide seating arrangement, its side review point actually can cover the vast majority of the viewers.
Likewise note that, Q80T’s 49 inches variation doesn’t have an enemy of glare optical layer for improving their side review point inclusion, in this way, can be discovered, their side viewing angle is poor, like a TV with customary VA panel.
Winner: Samsung Q90T
The X950H is available in 49-, 55-, 65-, 75-, and 85-inch sizes, with prices varying from $998 to $1198, $1698, $2798, and $3,998. (nonsale pricing). The X900H is available in 55-, 65-, 75-, and 85-inch models, with prices ranging from $998 to $2798, respectively.
The Samsung Q90T isn’t exactly inexpensive, despite being less costly at launch than last year’s Samsung Q90R QLED TV. These TVs are for luxury applications, starting at $1,499 (£1,399) for the 55-inch QN55Q90T and going up to $4,499 for the monstrous 85-inch screen, though it’s only available in the US at that size.
Meanwhile, the Samsung Q80T is available in 50-inch and 65-inch sizes, with the 50-inch variant costing $1099 and the 65-inch model costing $1799. If you need a package greater than 65 inches, the 75-inch model will set you back $2799, and the 85-inch model will set you back $3999.
Winner: Samsung Q80T
Alternatives Options of Sony X950H vs Samsung Q80T vs Samsung Q90T
LG CX OLED
The LG OLED TV CX redefines what you see. Other TVs pale in comparison until you’ve seen an LG OLED TV. For movies, films, athletics, and games, OLED is a game-changer. No detail is overlooked, from the gridiron to the iron throne.
- High contrast ratio.
- Gets very bright.
- Good reflection handling.
No voice remote.
The Hisense H9G Quantum Series 4K ULED Smart TV uses Quantum Dot technology to produce stunning images with richer colors, more detail, improved lighting, and smoother motion, making it ideal for showcasing your favorite movies, displays, sports, and gaming.
- Incredible brightness.
- Great color production.
- Value-forward price.
- Lacks VRR, ALLM, and eARC support.
Vizio P Series Quantum X 2020
The best picture VIZIO has ever made. The VIZIO P-Series Quantum X 65″ Class (64. 5″ Diag.) 4K HDR Smart TV is the pinnacle of home-theater entertainment. For captivating contrast, look no farther than our cinematic quantum-dot colors, our darkest blacks, and our brightest brights.
- Excellent picture quality
- Great design
- Plenty of smarts, features
Peak brightness is lower than LED competitors
Without a doubt, the Q80T is a fantastic television that can be used in a variety of ways and provides excellent results. In certain groups, though, the Q80T falls short of the Q90T, the leading QLED standard. The Q90picture T’s quality is significantly higher in both light and dark settings, allowing all content to be shown more clearly.
The Sony X950H is another excellent choice, offering a breathtaking HDR experience thanks to its high peak brightness and wide color gamut. However, in terms of hardware and features, the Sony X950H falls way short of the Samsung Q90T.
Thanks to an intuitive series of LED backlighting, the Samsung Q90T can have razor-sharp visibility and striking contrast, with decent picture quality in both bright and dark settings.
In a dim room, the Samsung Sony X950H vs Samsung Q80T vs Samsung Q90T are excellent TVs for watching movies. Meanwhile, the X950H outperforms both the Q80T and the Q90T in terms of local dimming performance and contrast ratio.
HDR output is strong on the Sony X950H, Samsung Q90T, and Samsung Q80T. Because of their significantly better peak brightness, wide color gamut, and color volume, the Q950H, and Q90T are slightly better than the Q80T in this range.
In a bright room, the Sony X950H, Samsung Q90T, and Samsung Q80T are all excellent TVs for watching sports. Besides that, by comparing the two, the Q80T outperforms the others in terms of pixel response time.
When it comes to racing, the Samsung Q80T outperforms both the Samsung Q90T and the Sony X950H. In reality, the Q80motion T’s handling is marginally better than the other two TVs, with a response time of less than 3ms. The Q80T would also be a perfect pick for those who choose next-generation gaming.
The X950H, on the other hand, has better black uniformity, color gradient, and peak brightness, making it better for watching movies in a dark room and having better HDR performance.
The Q80T, on the other hand, has improved motion handling, side viewing angle range, lower input lags, and VRR technology, making it better for watching sports and playing games.
So there’s a lot of grumbling because all of the TVs are outstanding – but the Q90T is the obvious favorite, with improved picture quality than the Samsung Q80T and more features and technologies than the Sony X950H.
Author’s Pick: Samsung Q90T
QLED or 4K UHD: which is better?
When comparing a 4K LED TV to a 4K QLED TV, the rule of thumb is that the QLED TV will have better color accuracy. Samsung sells the majority of QLED TVs, although it also supplies TCL and Hisense.
Is NanoCell superior to Qled?
In general, Samsung QLED TVs have superior contrast, brightness, and latency than other brands. LG NanoCell TVs, on the other hand, feature improved glare management and reaction speed.